Un Être Étoilique

An iconoclast exploring literature, film, and secularism.

Transformative Love Experienced: A Response to Bell Hook’s All About Love, Part One

I’ve always described life as a fluid force, like a steady stream flowing through a winding forest, with pivots and waterfalls where nature has intended them to be. The theme of love in my life has adopted this narrative, illustrating that love can return in many forms, like Franz Kafka, my favorite author, eloquently once said. In its essence, it has molded and transformed me.

I purchased a book by Bell Hooks just a few days ago, All About Love: New Visions, a book that has kept my attention, but has always been on my “maybe list” because I never felt the full desire to read it. After a turbulent experience with what most would describe as love, I abandoned relationship ideals and became single for three years, almost accidentally so. 

While possible relationships were teased with potential partners, something circumstantial or a conscious decision I would make would inhibit the full process. I thought by maintaining my intellectual front, I would be able to hold myself like Lou Andreas-Salomé, and egotistically, always be “the one who got away,” by these unhealed men who in turn, would hurt me. 

As a millennial who always claimed I was “born in the wrong decade,” experiencing dating during the peak of dating apps, especially during a pandemic, fostered a sense of subconscious objectification where the norm of “hookup culture” and cheating intimacy with naked bodies grinding against each other was expected. I found myself in one “situationship” after the next, devoting myself to someone emotionally without the physical expectation of a relationship. When one person would play games, the other would play them right back: I toxically blamed this on my Aquarius Venus, shrugging and laughing about it with friends who understood the joke. This was causing a deep riff in my psyche without me even realizing it.

The first time this realization occurred was when one of my situationships ended abruptly, and I was forced to reconcile with the person I was becoming in this dating culture. After a night of partying, I remember sitting in a stranger’s car crying when realizing how truly heartbroken I was, and no amount of impulsive sex could fix it. I walked away from that stranger, and became fully celibate for the next four or five months to truly love and understand the person I was becoming. And then the cycle began again.

I found myself in a couple more situationships, being mindful of my emotional wellbeing and nearly accepting the Samantha Jones lifestyle I would partake in for what I thought would be the rest of my life. I enjoyed the freedom that came with the lack of commitment, which in retrospect, was a defense mechanism materialized. I was guarding my heart, because of all the nuanced or dramatic heartbreak that I was consumed with throughout these years of singlehood, and my acceptance of singlehood became a part of that. I was, after all, “too smart for my own good,” as someone once told me. Like Bell Hooks, I always wondered if this intellectual nature would manifest into an unbreakable solitude. 

During this process, I signed up for classes after nearly a decade of not being in school, and began the academic journey I had promised myself four years prior. I knew there was no better time, and being able to focus on my studies while sprinkling in a first date every couple of weeks was the balance I strived for, as the brief spurts of attention from men would pacify this subconscious need to feel loved by another person. As my attention for them waned, so did my flow of romance: it wasn’t until my schedule came to a standstill after my first semester was over, and I realized how much I craved the serotonin rush that came with the novelty of unexplored love.

That was the first time I felt something missing, and the general “lack” that the French psychoanalyst Lacan described when defining love. I flowed with this achiness, processing the emotions I was experiencing, as I was reaching my twenty-ninth birthday. It was a special day for me, as twenty-nine has been one of my two favorite numbers since I could remember, and I was turning twenty-nine on the twenty-ninth. I can still recall the feeling I had when I was sitting across from my best friend on my birthday at the sushi restaurant I chose, and how I was predestined for only platonic love in this lifetime, with maybe a dose of romance every once in a while. No one person would embody everything I ever wanted in a romantic partner, and I accepted that. At that moment I felt truly free.

Shortly after this eruption of self-actualization, I was offered two paths. The first being the beginning of yet another cycle of unequally yoked relationships, or secondly, moving against the flow of what I was familiar with. For those of us who were born under the sign of Saturn, we are predestined to repeat karmic cycles unless we make a conscious effort to swim upstream. I faced this decision by choosing the unexplored river, turning at the pivot that I never had before. I was in my Saturn Return after all, and it was time to leave the repeated heartbreak behind. I listened to the words of well-meaning friends, reflected on past experiences, and leaped into a new beginning nearly blindfolded. So began the next chapter.

I still remember seeing his face for the first time, how in a sea of men the kindness in his eyes captivated me, and how curious I was about his Barcelona adventure, a city I had come to love after a matter of days. Even if we weren’t destined to be lovers, I knew we had a similar spirit, enticing a possibility of at least a strong friendship. At that time, I was moving through the world with an achy spirit, wondering if he would placate or resuscitate it. 

Over the course of the next few weeks, we took our texting to phone calls and FaceTime conversations. He held himself with a calm and serene energy, exemplifying his Taurus Sun, with his extensive vocabulary and love of poetry. He intrigued me, and his gentleness fully enraptured me. I felt a sincere kindness radiating from his soul, and my intuition which usually cautioned me was finally comforting me, letting me know that this man was here to stay. This initiated a whole new karmic cycle, this time for good. And once again, my intuition was right.

I still remember that Valentine’s Day, and how we had shared only one of many layers of ourselves, learning about each other’s interests, where we had traveled to, and where we wanted to head next. We were mapping a trajectory for the rest of our lives without realizing it, all because of who we authentically were and how we chose to share that with one another. The flow felt so organic because it was, and it reminded me of the feeling I had when stepping foot on the Barcelona sidewalks all those years ago, and how instantly at home I had felt. I can still remember, how weeks after that Valentine’s Day, the immediate stillness I had when laying on his chest for the first time in his parked car that fateful night. That was what I had been yearning for all that while, through the span of love and the pain that I thought always came with it. 

Around this time of experiencing this love reimagined, Orville Peck’s performance of “Let Me Drown” was released and I began reliving every experience that had brought me to the point of loving this person. Peck recited, “I know with pleasure comes pain,” and that was when I truly comprehended how true our love was: with this man, I felt no pain, only the warm embrace of the sun after a cold winter’s day. As Bell Hooks said in her first chapter in All About Love, love and pain do not coincide with each other: we are just taught that in our upbringings. Love is transformative. Love is caring. Love is not abusive or painful. And he was the manifestation of all things good; he was true love in the flesh. Our earth sign energy created an alchemical reaction, taking what I knew to be love to a whole new spiritual plane of existence.

End of Part One

Adaptability, Mindfulness, and the Uncertain: A Reminder for Anxious Lovers

Not everyone is guaranteed a happy ending. Our westernized mentality has been shaped by the hero’s victory in almost every contemporary film and novel. Obstacles and enemies are added purely for story. We’ve learned to subconsciously adopt this mentality too: that no matter what we experience, we’re bound to eventually win. And every time we don’t, we find vices of our own to numb our response to the unpredictable.

I think we need to be more mindful to overcome the inevitable times ahead. To be mindful requires more privilege than a lot of people realize, which is a certain level of internal and physical comfort for the ability to think and act freely. Accessing this privilege can be easy for some, and more difficult for others: the most important skill to learn is adaptability. Are you able to adapt to your situation? If so, you can learn to be mindful.

mind·ful

/ˈmīn(d)fəl/

adjective
1. conscious or aware of something.

2. focusing one’s awareness on the present moment, especially as part of a therapeutic or meditative technique.

Screen Shot 2020-04-07 at 8.09.49 PM

Unpacking our generation’s growing anxiety is a dense lesson at best, but for the sake of the argument, I’d like to simplify anxiety as the inability to access the present moment. It’s the mindset of constantly thinking ahead, sometimes behind, and not being able to process what is happening in front of you with a clear lens.

This overlaps into our romantic lives more than we realize: there’s a reason why most people fear cheating in relationships, aren’t vulnerable with one another, and self-destruct their relationships subconsciously. Many of us are afraid of commitment, labels, and having our freedom jeopardized. That comes from an internalized anxiety created by the society that we have no choice but to be a part of. Culture is a direct reflection of society, and the stories we digest daily have harmed our most natural human instinct: loving one another.

Think of who we were as children: for most of us, we naturally trusted others, especially our peers. Becoming friends with a random stranger in kindergarten came laughably easy, but the older and more cognizant we became, the more we loosened our grip with boundless love for our fellow human. Our naivety became a sign of weakness; we began overthinking our interactions with others, realizing that social popularity had its advantages. School became the training ground for our adult lives in our workplace and everyday recreations. For those of us who were lucky enough to recognize the banality of subscribing to the social norm in our adolescent and teenage years, I can almost guarantee that our paths were much different from those that did.

Screen Shot 2020-04-07 at 8.17.11 PM

Like most young girls, I wanted to be popular for a period of time. But when I realized that I had much more fun with the theatre kids, art school wannabes, and social outcasts in general, the more I began shedding that superficial mindset.

I moved out when I was nineteen, dated a number of men who showed me alternative ways of thinking and adapting, and fell in love more times than I can count. I loved hippies, musicians, and psychedelic users: people who much like me, saw the flaws with the norm, and lived a life outside of it.

My most fulfilling relationships were with men who lived in the present. They would see our connection as something to embrace in the moment, recognizing our impermanence and forcing vulnerability as a means to cut the bullshit.

Because to be vulnerable with another person requires intimacy with oneself: the less one knows themselves, the less likely they’re going to open up to someone out of fear of abandonment. But if there’s one powerful lesson I’ve learned through the ebbs and flows of my romantic life is, whatever pain another person has caused you is a result of their decisions and not yours. We cannot control anyone or anything: the only thing we can control is our response to it. And the best response is a mindful one.

Screen Shot 2020-04-07 at 8.18.23 PM

So when we don’t get our way, our partner cheats or breaks up with us, feeling what we need to feel is essential, but we should never retaliate; their shortcomings are not our responsibility. Because when we retaliate, we project that we either engendered or created their flaws. But they are what make them human, and finding that alcove of love despite them is what determines long lasting compatibility. And fully accepting someone for who they are goes back to our damaged nature previously spoken about: loving one another. “I love you, therefore I want you to be you.”

We need to understand that our partners shouldn’t be held accountable for our happiness; only we are in control of that. They should merely encourage that part of ourselves, not dictate it. Emotionally functioning outside of codependency is what will determine a potential breakup’s interpretation: is it an “unhappy ending” or just an unexpected circumstance?

The ideal happy ending was spawned by a marketing industry to generate more profit. As Thoreau said, “Happiness is like a butterfly,” knowing how temporary and uncertain it can be. Retire the manufactured happy ending; choose to be present and know that every moment is fleeting. That is true fulfillment.

Relationships, Love is Blind, and Quarantine: A Summary of Self-Reflection Amid the Unprecedented

Watching the world descend into a hopeless panic feels familiar: while I have never been in these exact mysterious circumstances, I’ve felt these feelings of uncertainty and tension many times before. They often come in the form of relationships, most often in uncontrollable situations; the times that I’ve ceased any sort of foresight and give it up to the “Universe’s” hands, or whatever definition I give it at the time.

A couple of weeks ago, I began a conversation with a coworker about relationships: she responded that she’s been with her boyfriend for seven years, which I answered with, “I like that, though – I’ve never had a relationship that long so I always enjoy hearing that from other people.”

My longest relationship was two and a half years. I’m twenty-seven with plenty of dating experience, short term relationships and all. Because even with my longest relationship, I was beginning to check out maybe a year or so into it, both from a combination of his flaws and my unsettled nature. I have a tendency to over-analyze every part of a person, including myself, so I have yet to find a partner I can’t pick apart because of this inherent nature.

Screen Shot 2020-03-22 at 8.22.50 PM

A lot of it comes from my logical mindset: much like Darwin’s theory of “survival of the fittest,” I learn from my mistakes to better adapt. If person A does X, that means that person B who also does X will have a similar result: conflict, stress, and/or heartbreak. Which is the oversimplified version of how my brain works and why I feel so restlessly picky, probably ending up alone although that doesn’t seem to fare so bad, especially amid the quarantine we’re all under.

Truth is, I love being alone. I love my friends, socializing, and endlessly expanding my friend group, but the thought of spending my “forever” with anyone seems unrealistic with a personality like mine.

I process almost all of my emotions internally, rarely showing how I feel physically unless someone is a fellow empath or happens to know me very well. I treasure that time by myself, as I rarely seem to get it outside of this social isolation. So being in the presence of another person consistently only aggravates the tension I have within myself to process what I need to. And I truly realized this after watching the first episode of Love is Blind.

So many people told me how great of a show it was: but unsurprisingly, my overthinking nature kicked in and I couldn’t enjoy the show for what it was. Instead, I found myself mercilessly critiquing the plot, finding the traditional concept of marriage unappealing, and getting annoyed with most of the cast from the beginning. I’m no “Debbie Downer,” it’s just that I couldn’t muster enough empathy for most of the cast because a lot of them came across as desperate, as if they were lacking a partner, when in reality we all lack nothing: it’s a mindset shift than many of us need to adopt and I found that this show perpetuated this deceptive concept.

Screen Shot 2020-03-22 at 8.24.00 PM

To me, a partner is only supposed to add to your life, not complete it. And I think that’s my main issue with traditional marriage’s ideals: once married, a lot of people consider their life goals met. And I get that everyone has different goals; it’s more of the complex social structure that surrounds it, and the unhealthy mindset it promotes of having someone be “their better half.”

The monogamous framework that modern society follows came from evolutionary and sociological biases that have become outdated. Mating with a singular partner for land, status, or financial stability is unnecessary: now women have fought and won the battle to be career-driven and make just as much, if not more, than their partners. And especially for those of us who aren’t religious, premarital sex comes more as a punchline than anything else.

The reason why many of us monogamously settle down usually comes from loneliness, which is a direct result of society’s unrelenting pretense that we lack “something,” often in the form of a partner or spouse. That’s why romantic movies become blockbusters and shows like Love is Blind and The Bachelor(ette) are so successful. Society continues to emotionally manipulate us to feed corporate’s greed, and we learn to drown out this existential noise with our vices and impulsive purchases. As a previous marketing major, I learned this the hard way.

Screen Shot 2020-03-22 at 8.24.40 PM

This isn’t to say I don’t believe in romantic love. And by no means am I bitter; I am simply observing as an outsider looking in and as someone who once blindly followed the traditional notion of love that was taught rather than experienced firsthand. Because it wasn’t until I moved out and dated unconventional thinkers and learned what my dating style was: respecting each other’s space and individualism while bettering each other day by day. It seems simple enough, but organic chemistry and putting words into action is much harder to come by than it seems.

And while everyone has a different love language, childhood, and sociological makeup, asking people to think critically about their relationship style is only beneficial for the long-term as we look back in retrospect about the decisions we’ve made, and if we made them as a formulaic result of our upbringing and social standards, or if they were decided with true mindfulness and authenticity.

It’s okay to question what you do: cognitive dissonance (when your behavior doesn’t align with your doubts) is merely a sign of growth and self-awareness, and love is a great catalyst in which to do so.

Letting Love Be: A Lesson in Fearlessness Following Its Reawakening

“The hand that extends toward the fruit, the rose, or the log that suddenly bursts into flames – its gesture of reaching, drawing close, or stirring up is closely related to the ripening of the fruit, the beauty of the flower, and the blazing of the log. If, in the movement of reaching, drawing, or stirring, the hand goes far enough toward the object that another hand comes out of the fruit, flower, or log and extends toward your hand – and at that moment your hand freezes in the closed plenitude of the fruit, in the open plenitude of the flower, or in the explosion of a log which bursts into flames – then what is produced is love.”

-Jacques Lacan, Transference: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VIII

 

Of the five love languages, I respond best with quality time. Because when spending time with anyone, lover or otherwise, I inevitably grow closer to them, or in some cases, further apart. “Growing closer” can be described as “transference” in psychoanalytical terms, which is essentially a subconscious exchange of ideas, often used in a psychoanalyst and analysand setting. Especially for those of us who are more sensitive, we have a tendency to empathize with others easier than average. This ability to take on the emotions of those we care about increases the accessibility of these subconscious exchanges.

I think that’s why I’ve fallen in love more times than my peers – just the other day, I was expressing my feelings about someone to a coworker who responded that she’s never been in love, even though she’s four years older than I am. It had nothing to do with her dating history, which consisted of casual and serious relationships. Relationships don’t always equate romantic love. A lot of the men I’ve fallen in love with were never even “official,” as I’ve never been the type to seek a label to define the kind of love I have toward another person. And since I’m non-monogamous by nature, sometimes giving a label can sabotage the relationship.

l1

While I recognize the lessons I learned from my previous marriage, it’s a constant reminder of the self-betrayal I committed. Four years ago, I wrote an essay insisting that I’d never get married, and after getting married two years ago, I can earnestly say that I predicted my desires correctly. And it’s hard to see myself ever getting married again – not because I feel jaded, rather because I learned an important lesson about who I was as a person when I was essentially forced to be who I wasn’t.

Being a mother is one thing, being a wife is another. I can truly love a child unconditionally, another peer I cannot: not because I don’t want to, but because of the kind of pain I’ve dealt with.

When causing pain toward a parent, a child doesn’t realize the extent of that pain. When they reach puberty and adulthood, they’re still a part of their parent and that maternal love won’t falter because we watch them grow in our wombs into a fully cognizant being. And that process is enough to create an everlasting love, as this is the quality time love language in practice. The complexity of the relationship between a mother and son is something I’m slowly unraveling as I raise a toddler to be the best version of himself.

The longest relationship I had spanned about two and a half years. The shortest was a month and every other fluctuated between 6 months and one year. While I am attracted to a general personality type (usually creative, intelligent, humorous, and emotionally reserved), I have experimented with extroverts and introverts, non-creatives, those with or without mental illnesses, etc., and have learned that I’m the most universally compatible with an independent type. This independent type has a tendency to choose what’s best for them, which also means that I’ve dealt with a lot of heartbreak from these men. I’ve heard countless variations of the “it’s not you, it’s me” speech. Over time, I adopted that mindset, not necessarily from a self-centered perspective, but to curtail my self-sacrificing instead.

l4

Having an empathetic nature is a gift, but an exhausting one. Especially when in relationships, I have an innate tendency to prioritize my partner’s needs first. It’s something I’ve learned to reign in, more so after entering a marriage I didn’t want to be a part of. I always joke that “no one held a gun up to my head,” but the reality is that I got traditionally married for him, not me. I wanted my son to have the best life possible, so I sacrificed my freedom by marrying someone I wasn’t compatible with, which unsurprisingly, ended poorly.

I did love my ex at the time, but in my gut, I knew it wasn’t a good idea – I ignored my instinct so I could follow what was socially acceptable, because the last thing I wanted layered on top of an unexpected pregnancy was people’s harsh judgment toward me. I cared too much about what people thought about me instead of choosing what was best long term, which is why it’s a constant reminder to never commit this heavy of a self-betrayal again.

And after going through this experience, not only did I learn that marriage wasn’t for me, but that I’m also incapable of giving what the Greeks called agape, or an everlasting and unconditional love, which is arguably the foundation of any successful marriage.

To me, “unconditional” implies a lack of boundaries. While I ended some of my relationships to pursue my own interests, there were others I ended because of their abusive nature. Staying with your partner while they insult you is not loyalty: it’s unhealthy (or lack of) boundaries. Fearing for your safety in your own home is all the incentive that anyone needs to leave a relationship: married, casual, or otherwise. The gravity that our society places on labels is dangerous for anyone in these types of situations. And this is why I don’t want to get married again: the amount of backlash I received from people who followed social norms (relatives mostly) only added to the emotional distress I was under; I had no choice but to seek therapy and cope in whatever way I could.

l3

I learned a painful lesson about marriage, and subconsciously, about love too. I learned that love can be manipulated and later transformed into resentment. I learned that no matter how much you love someone, you cannot heal them. I learned that even those closest to you will hurt you in ineffable ways. I began to fear love because of this. But this fear was dormant, and it didn’t hijack my thoughts until I started to feel it all over again not too long ago.

Suddenly, what I thought was a compatible relationship became an incompatible one. I started looking for any reason to leave him, because I didn’t want to enter the same cycle I had those few years ago. I was on defense mode instead of choosing to welcome love back into my life.

I left him because I was overwhelmed. There were other factors contributing to my stress, but I figured by severing this romantic connection, I’d be able to filter out my emotions in the same way I was always used to. I could intellectualize what I was feeling, vent to my therapist, and move on. This was self-sabotage, because as I said to my friend, “I’d rather ruin love before it ruins me.”

But me breaking it off ironically became the catalyst in choosing to love him. We had already established a friendship within our dating period, but it grew that much stronger after we became platonic. All of a sudden, I felt more comfortable venting about whatever emotional bout I was experiencing, and interacting with him as a friend developed a bond that I wouldn’t have gotten with a romantic framework. The quality time that we spent together was proof that we were compatible in more ways than one.

l2

This deep “friend love” re-established the previous romantic feelings I had for him. I began shedding the barrier I created over the past year; I started to trust him in inexplicable ways. And where words fell short, love came in.

Like Lacan’s allegory, I set my log ablaze and now I was basking in its warmth. I was no longer afraid of the burst in its wake.

The night I told him that I loved him was my reckoning for my wounded inner child. I no longer let fear dictate my actions; I stopped prioritizing control and intellectualizing everything I felt. I just let love be.

And I will continue to let it be. We might be a society structured by language, but I refuse to set unnecessary limitations for this abstract, yet relevant feeling. Language has a tendency to inhibit inhibitable concepts, especially love.

When I realized I was in love, my mind immediately started asking logistical questions, rationalizing things that society had trained me to. This only exasperated my fear, causing me to restrain my emotion in a situation that required nothing more than a childlike openness.

And this reconciliation for my past self, both for the child who never felt emotionally connected to and my adult self whose heart had been through years of damage, has proven itself worthy of all the potential risks that can often outshine this unrivaled feeling. By letting go of fear, I’ve let love in for the first time in a long time and it’s beautiful.

Making a Wrong Right: Choosing Love as an Act of Defiance

“I have a tendency to overcompensate,” I explained to my therapist, “because I never really got the emotional connection I needed at home, so I find that when I interact with anyone, specifically those I’m on dates with, I can connect easily.”

“Another way of saying ‘attach,’” she responded, “but I do think you’re right.”

I sat still, digesting the words she said, realizing how easily attached I’ve become. I blamed a lot of this behavior on my arbitrary zodiac placement, and how my Pisces moon meant I was an innate hopeless romantic. But I always wanted a believable reason why, and she just gave it to me.

Whenever I tell people how many times I’ve been in love, I’m often met with surprise followed by questioning. I’m always ready to explain how and why, knowing how unbelievable it might be for a person my age.

1600px-Egon_Schiele_-_Liebespaar_-_1913

One explanation I’ve given was, “I’ve always been open minded to every form of love,” knowing how diverse my relationships have been. I’ve been in intensive short relationships and even married at one point: over time, I’ve learned what functions best with my perspective and ever-changing identity. And that, to me, is my unwavering attachment to freedom.

I’ve been teased about being a “heartbreaker” because of my insistence on not having an ultimate end goal. I never sought a nuclear family, although I always wanted to be a mother. I remember one of my exes even joking with me, “Well, in order to have a child, you need a dad, so good luck with that.” And I agreed with him, but I knew that I wasn’t capable of committing to someone for the rest of my life, at least in the traditional sense.

I love people and I easily attach to them. It’s rare that I meet someone that I dislike. I always see the good in others, which is why I’ve fallen in love many times. There have been times when my gut has pulled me in the opposite direction, but my need to heal those around me has quieted that voice telling me to leave.

Schiele - Embrace - 1917

This lack of emotional connection at home was what led to this savior complex, because when I see the inner pain of those close to me, I see myself. I see that teenager crying in her bedroom, wondering why my ceaseless questions remained unanswered, and why I felt so isolated in a community of so many. I was alone during these formative years and left praying to a nonexistent god. But these years of talking to myself was what formed my unshakeable independence, learning that being self-sufficient was what would carry me into adulthood.

This self-confidence has attracted many, and in turn has led me down many romantic avenues. I’ve utilized my caretaking attributes in them and helped those that were willing to accept it. And every one I ever loved was reparation to that young girl who felt so hopeless all those years ago. Me loving them was a subconscious effort to love myself and heal those wounds that I didn’t realize were still bleeding out.

egon-schiele-friendship-800x800

But because of my gullible nature, I’ve fallen in love with the wrong people. And those people have called me things that I was always afraid of being accused of. Those moments of raw, unfiltered emotion shared between us reminded me of the wounds I forgotten I had, because I was ironically trying to heal those around me. But, it also helped me confront my deepest insecurities that would have otherwise gone unnoticed. And I’m grateful for it in retrospect.

Every person has contributed to my story, some of whom have been more beneficial than others. The overarching theme has been my emotional overcompensation and my innate desire to help those around me.

With the realization that my nature comes from my loneliness as a teenager, I can’t help but be grateful for how much it’s benefited past lovers, and how much it will continue to help those I’ll eventually love. My pain has become a tool of empathy, and without it, I would have never had such a rich romantic history with stories to match.

An Open Letter to Those That I’ve Loved

To those that I’ve loved,

Thank you.

My dating life has spanned over seven years, not including my brief period of adolescent love.

I was nineteen when I began officially dating for the first time. I was living on my own, so I could do what I wanted, when I wanted to. It signified a new age of independence and coming into my own, which, by obvious means, needed a significant learning curve.

Growing up religious curtailed a lot of my innately secular desires. I remember saying to my friend, “I think the most exciting thing about getting married is finally having sex.” Those words stain a memory in my mind, as it was not only a vulnerable moment, but a very self-realized one.

I remember being sixteen (the age that most of my current friends lost their virginity), and planning my ideal wedding: it’d be at an pompous church, with one to two hundred people, and my cream white dress would run several feet behind me, much like a Met Gala gown. I wanted to put on a show to subconsciously prove something in a way.

And that “something,” as it turned out, was my self-worth.

Screen Shot 2019-05-28 at 7.50.46 PM

I love people, and they seem to love me. I heard a quote the other day, “He loved people and would do anything to make them love him in return,” and that deeply resonated with me. It was then that I understood why being “liked” meant so much to me: I felt like an outsider for so long, so to finally feel welcomed was invaluable, and loving people was my catalyst in doing so.

While I’ve never had to “perform” for my friends, I’ve performed for several lovers. Many of you don’t know who you are, and that’s okay. I was scared of losing you, so I’d act however you needed me to at the time – and I wouldn’t call it insincerity, I would instead call it fear.

So many of decisions were based out of fear:

fear of being hurt,

fear of being abandoned,

or fear of being unloved.

Being “loved” was my identity, and I was terrified of losing it.

Little did I know, every breakup I had would assist me in destroying my ego, better known as my identity.

I loved a hippie when I lived in Berkeley and listened to music from the 60’s and 70’s.

I loved a poet as I was just discovering my love of writing.

I loved a teacher when I was pursuing a career in education.

I loved a man with Aspergers as I began my own pursuit in psychology.

I loved a kind heart when I was at my most broken.

I loved a brainiac skateboarder as I began my obsession with skateboarding.

And lastly, I loved a German when I wanted to leave my American identity behind.

lover2

Every one of you symbolized the internal transition I had, and each of you brought value to my life when I needed it.

You represented the temporary identity I had, and like Lacan theorized, you became my mirror. And by moving on, you helped me uncover more of my inner child that was concealed by the “identities” I fostered in adulthood.

While some relationships were harder than others, I am grateful for each. Some of you hurt me more than others. A couple of you were the reason why I sought therapy.

But, without therapy, I wouldn’t have chosen my career path. You forged a path that I didn’t know I needed to take.

This path led me down a winding road of deep understanding, because “all sorts of things in this world behave like mirrors,” and I attracted many broken men because I too, was broken.

“Fixing” people became cathartic, and it shifted my attention to someone else, because if I was mending someone else’s broken heart, I wouldn’t have time to deal with my own pain.

Because as the song goes, “pain breaks the rhythm.”

And I needed rhythm and structure, or at least that’s what my ego told me.

As reflective as I was, I was still withholding information from myself. And it wasn’t until an experience with LSD opened my eyes to what I needed to see most.

That night, I had a powerful hallucination: I saw every single person I had loved, and each face metamorphosed into each other in chronological order. It finally became the man I was with, and I understood what I understand now: each person served their purpose until that moment, and I was to focus on the here and now. He, at the time, was that “here and now.”

He had an important lesson to teach me that evening and I haven’t forgotten it since, as I’ve fallen in love with a few others after him.

lover

The thing is, when I get in touch with my “higher self,” I love selflessly. I feel secure, and let the person be themselves unapologetically.

But due to the trauma I’ve dealt with, my ego resurfaces when triggered. I insist on controlling the situation; I want to ensure I experience as little pain as possible. I consider this a defense mechanism, although those at the receiving end often consider it an offensive attack.

And for those of you who have dealt with this side of me, I’m sorry.

I have a tendency to take on the caretaker role, and so checking in with those I love is normal, but when jeopardized, I want control. And in my reflective moments, I realized that my reactions were destructive and something I needed to confront in therapy, because otherwise that previous pain I had experienced would continue to reemerge in this way.

Because if there’s one thing I dislike more than a liar, is a hypocrite. And I hate feeling controlled.

And if I love someone, I want them to be the best version of themselves, and dictating their actions out of fear (created by the ego) is harmful. I’m gradually shedding this part of myself, so that future lovers won’t have to deal with this aspect of my personality.

And without falling in love with you, I would have never learned this. And this is something I want to thank each of you for.

Screen Shot 2019-05-28 at 7.57.11 PM

Our arguments that we shared also offered necessary moments of reflection: every one of you taught me how to react in turbulent situations. Many of you fell into the passive spectrum, while a couple of you had deep-seated anger issues. For those of you that would throw objects when mad, thank you for teaching me to stay calm for future patients in my practice, as I’ve learned that doctors often have to deal with belligerent patients (especially those diagnosed with schizophrenia, where I plan to specialize in). Thank you for calling me names and triggering my hidden insecurities, as I know I will hear those exact derogatory slurs as I help heal psych ward patients. I know how diverse the field is that I’m going into, so dealing with these extremities first-hand outside of the clinic has given me the experience I need. Now I know I can handle the pressure that comes with the practice.

At one time, I hated those of you that did this to me, but with healing, came forgiveness. I know that these violent behaviors were from repressed trauma, so with time, I began to understand why you treated me the way you did. I genuinely hope you also find healing in the years to come. And I pray that no other woman has to go through the same thing I did.

I will continue to learn one painful lesson after the next, but luckily these lessons will lighten as I continue to progress internally. I’m glad each of you came into my life to symbolize every inner battle I’ve faced; you taught me who I was in every stage of adulthood.

Many of you also caused more happiness than harm. And for those that did, thank you for being kind to me when I needed it most.

I sincerely wish every one of you the best as we continue to cultivate ourselves apart from one another. May your days be filled with love and growth.

With kindest regards,

Sarah

Love as a Commodity: The Insidious Act of Possession in Millennial Relationships

Millennials are born between 1981 and 1996. I was born in 1992, meaning I fall right into the millennial age bracket. The coined term is often affiliated with a negative reputation, although that primarily comes from older generations. We millennials defend that label due to the hardworking nature that comes with the society we were placed in.

This hardworking nature comes from having an unlivable minimum wage, where we commonly work more than one job to make ends meet. And in America, we accumulate debt from school loans and credit cards to later enter into a vicious cycle of interest rates and living paycheck to paycheck. This lifestyle has been attributed to the growing climate of mental illnesses including depression and anxiety. I think every single peer I know has it in one form or another.

But with this financial drought came an information overflow because of the internet. Our generation were the ones caught right between the death of manual research and the birth of instant response: we have the answers to many questions (both simple and complex) within arms reach. This was also the catalyst to the existential dilemma that many of us have; suddenly, we could answer everything except what our purpose in life was, especially for the irreligious (24%).*

Screen Shot 2019-05-23 at 8.44.25 PM

With this information overflow came dating apps like Tinder and Bumble. Not only did we have answers to mundane questions, but we also could select people like an entree at a restaurant; the dating world had become much more expansive than our parents’ generations or the ones before it. And, as a generation dealing with existential dread, this became an outlet.

Apps like Tinder were based solely on looks, because while the 500 character bio could deter or attract some, the first impression was the photo. I used it for a few years; it was addictive, and swiping became second nature. Looking at brief photos of men and women signaled a negative transition into romance, and in retrospect, was disappointing upon further observation.

Much like a google search, I could easily pull up an attractive man and set up a date for the near future and it was instant gratification. And while I didn’t use it like many others did for sex, it would often end that way regardless – it was a way to maintain my sex drive without any real commitment.

This was a perfect setup for me in my early twenties; I was never good at meeting people in loud, crowded bars. Many of my friends found hookups in that format but I never wanted to sleep with anyone purely because of their physical qualities. Instead I’d spend hours talking to someone with the hope of having a second date or two, but rarely ending it in an actual relationship.

Screen Shot 2019-05-23 at 8.45.22 PM

But for those I did end up having a relationship with, I noticed a common trend regardless of how compatible we were: we’d like each other quickly, and then over the course of six months, we’d end things. While many other psychological and scientific aspects are considered, the underlying theme was our millennial age bracket. Every emotional connection I shared was unique in its own way, but the way they’d fizzle out were almost identical. And I blame it on the instant gratification many of us are used to.

We use people in a way – not to say it’s a testament of character, rather a symptom of naivety. We lack self-awareness in many ways, this being one of them. Biologically speaking, in our early to mid-twenties, we’re genetically predisposed to want to have sex and a lot of it. With sex, comes an endorphin rush, leading to attachments, which eventually turn into relationships. Every peer that I know has been in several relationships, some more serious than others, but that’s often dependent on the person themselves. It’s perfectly normal and healthy to do so, but with these dating apps at our disposal, it’s created a breeding ground for toxic relationships.

Screen Shot 2019-05-23 at 8.45.52 PM

A toxic relationship can take many forms, the most common being the anxious attachment kind. There are three types of attachment: secure, anxious, and avoidant. Their labels are self-explanatory, and unfortunately many people fall into the anxious or avoidant category. It comes from childhood and how we were treated, so unless someone had a near perfect upbringing, they’re less than likely going to be part of the secure attachment style.

Anxious and avoidant styles are often attracted to each other, as they have a tendency to (in the least healthiest way) balance each other out. On one hand, the anxious partner will be very dependent on their partner, being “clingy” in a way. They constantly fear losing their partner and act irrational because of it. On the other, the avoidant type will not be emotionally vulnerable with their partner because it’s a way of maintaining control. They’re often overwhelmed by their anxious partner, and it can lead to unnecessary arguments.

My therapist explained this allegory to me using her hand motions: you have one person (the avoidant) constantly trying to walk away, but the anxious partner will continue to follow, keeping the gap between them, and backing the avoidant partner into a corner, which will eventually cause an implosion due to the extreme amount of tension caused by the anxious type.

Screen Shot 2019-05-23 at 8.46.07 PM

While anxiety can materialize in several forms, the anxious type does have a tendency to be a lot more confrontational, as they seek control (stemmed from fear) in their situation. Their way of seeking control is much different from the avoidant type due to how they choose to express it: the anxious type seeks as much communication as possible, making sure that their partner is in check to keep their reigns as tight as possible. The avoidant type is just the opposite, and instead doesn’t approach certain topics because remaining neutral maintains the playing field. In other words, the anxious type has external reactions while the avoidant type has internal, meaning it can be condensed into an extrovert vs. introvert interaction.

And the ultimate problem with the anxious type is how their control manifests itself in the form of possession. Possession is what many people subconsciously suffer from relationship-wise, especially the anxious type. An anxious type often sets their partner on a pedestal and sets high expectations for them. Expectations will always inevitably fall short, ending in misunderstandings and arguments. This is even more common when they constantly try to control their partner.

But, in almost a masochistic way, the anxious type enjoys this. They think of it as a testament of their “love” for their partner, when in fact it’s just a toxic representation of the love they needed as children. The anxious type as children didn’t receive consistent communication from their parent (often mother): as in this parent was emotionally unbalanced, absent, or a combination of the two. It left the child feeling uneasy and constantly on edge, even frightened at times. Over time, they developed anxiety which transitioned into adulthood and consequently their relationships. This is obviously not the child’s fault, but learning to reprimand such behaviors in adulthood is a decision they have to consciously make.

Screen Shot 2019-05-23 at 8.46.32 PM

Unfortunately many don’t, and they continue to date either avoidant or secure types, which eventually turn into turbulent relationships over time. But this obsession with “possession,” is a common symptom of their behavior, as they feel they can actually own/control something that gives them love back for once.

And as the human species, our need to be loved is universal. That’s why the toxic trait of “possession” is common among almost everyone. The avoidant type shows this behavior too, as not wanting to confront otherwise difficult topics maintains the status quo, even if the relationship is slowly imploding. They’d rather keep their partner than have the possibility of losing them in a disagreement. They’re controlled by fear just as much as the anxious type, although as mentioned before, they express it differently.

While both the anxious and avoidant types are created in childhood, I’d argue that these behaviors are exasperated by our society. Take social media, for example: we’re constantly exposed to relationships of friends and strangers, often with an idealized perception of them. Visual cues from advertisements, films, and music videos continually force the romantic narrative on us. We start to subconsciously equate having relationships as a representation of our self-worth.

Screen Shot 2019-05-23 at 8.51.01 PM

Because unlike the generations before us, in our mid-twenties, we’re lucky to own a car, much less a house. Our level of self-accomplishment is paying all our bills and still having money left over. And with the weight of student debt and the guilt of “underperforming” (with comparison between peers being much easier with social media), a romance seems to be the only thing we can have a positive impact toward.

And especially as the millennial generation, we seek that validation from partners. Love is a natural need, and possession is its ugly counterpart which is unfortunately nurtured by the system that we live in. The more that we’re aware of this harmful “want,” the more likely we’re able to correct it over time to ultimately lessen the likelihood of a toxic relationship. Learning about our own self-worth is a defense against those who desire it, because some people will refuse to fix this behavior.

Ideally, we’d all have secure/healthy relationships, as captured in the quote, “A healthy relationship is one where we have a mutual interest in each other’s expansion. I love you, therefore I wish to see you grow and evolve into the highest expression of yourself, with or without me.” Which is understood as the epitome of “anti-possession;” the ultimate form of love being freedom shared between partners. Hypothetically, no one would own one another, rather we would learn to accept each other as individuals outside of the relationship, and let go of control and subsequently fear. This will take plenty of trial and error to truly master, but it is an invaluable gift to share with a potential partner, millennials or otherwise.

All photos created by @gaelleelma
*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreligion_in_the_United_States

Encountering Past Selves: Confronting the Hollow Grave of Who I Once Was

I’m a writer. I structure my life according to a narrative, meaning conflict is part of what makes my story interesting – but as a sensitive person, that conflict can carry a burden on my tired shoulders. I’ve lived through a lot for twenty-six year old, all of which were purposeful and necessary. I’ve luckily never experienced a close friend or family member dying, but I’ve become familiar with the concept through a bout of extreme depression and threats from those who supposedly loved me. And my empathetic nature has leant itself plenty of moments of deep melancholy, stemming from those close to me, or from my mind itself.

And being back in Orange County, the place where I spent most of my adolescence and teen years, I’ve confronted what I thought was buried to only find a shallow grave. Although I’ve seen therapists throughout the years, my depression has never fully dissipated and returns in my most vulnerable moments. So when I made my decision to live in Orange County instead of Germany, I ripped off a band-aid I didn’t realize I had. The wound from my past was exposed, and this was the time for it to finally scar over.

Screen Shot 2019-05-09 at 5.39.52 PM

This wound was confronting my past self: the religious, a-type Sarah was created from fostered anxiety from both the church and my upbringing. My subconscious misogyny was deeply ingrained in me, and thoughts of sex and promiscuity were unrighteous and sinful. Women weren’t allowed behind the altar, and the looks I’d receive for expressing myself affected me internally. I became bitter for a period, reading atheist literature and condemning the church and religion with a metaphoric burning cross in hand.

And while I did grow out of it, it’s impossible not to revisit it when I’m in the place that birthed its foundation. Although no one has confronted me about it, I’ve come in contact with previous classmates who share a similar sentiment. We bond quickly, knowing that our experience mirror one another’s, especially for those of us who went from one end of the spectrum to the other in a span of ten years.

The close-minded nature of Orange County fed into my depression and never feeling like I fit in; feeling constantly displaced affected my psyche in nearly impenetrable ways. And that’s how I felt in Berlin after two and a half years. While it was a vibrant city overflowing with opportunity, I felt like I had overstayed my welcome, and my gut was telling me to return home. Especially on an academic level, it only made sense for my career in the years to come.

Quirky Berkeley 11-28-2016

So while being back, I knew I needed a break from Orange County’s atmosphere. I set up an academic appointment with my city college in Berkeley, and planned to spend a weekend up in the Bay. I lived in the Bay Area from 2012 to 2014 and loved it; the only reason why I moved was due to its rising cost of living. And now having traveled much of the world, it’s the place I see myself settling in the most.

Little did I know this break from Orange County’s reality would cause such a bittersweet friction. Within the first few hours of being in Berkeley, I was approached by a couple people, asking about my academic career and encouraging me on my path. The random stimulating conversations I shared when I was there was a testament of my love for the area. And so for the first time in a while, I felt like I finally fit in.

I got on my bus back home, longing to see my son, all while not wanting to leave the uplifting environment I was in. This dissonance left me plenty to reflect over on the seven hour ride home.

berkeley1

Berkeley was the city I discovered myself in. I was nineteen when I moved there, and it was the first time I lived outside of my parents’ home. I felt free because of that, but even more so because of the area I was in. The intellectual nature of the area allowed creative expression without judgment. And I felt free because I was.

Returning to it reminded me of that period of my life. Much like returning to Orange County, I was reminded of my previous self, this time with a positive nostalgia in tow. No feelings of ostracism lingered, rather complete and full acceptance of who I was and aspired to be welcomed me back with open arms.

And that feeling is invaluable. Finding my community and being able to share my ideas with like-minded people was as fulfilling as one could hope – it was a mere confirmation that my path in life would inevitably lead me back to the Bay in one way or another. As for now, letting my past scar over is my current goal while living here in Orange County, and I’m grateful for the opportunity nevertheless. Because as life has proven so many times before, I always end up where I need to be.

Heart on Fire: The Process of Healing Through a Psychoanalytic Lens

A rational mind cannot comprehend emotions. Emotions are as unpredictable as wildfire and depending on its conditions, they often can’t be contained.

Take heartbreak, a common state of mind, for instance. It can either be quick or slow moving. The body responds like a withdrawal from a drug: it shuts down, often looking for a replacement in either a form of abuse (drugs, alcohol) or rebounds. The healthiest response is to seek emotional rehabilitation, something incredibly hard to do on one’s own.

Therapy is a healthy alternative, but can be unaffordable. On one’s own, he or she has to be aware of one’s emotions because when caught in the undercurrent, it can be hard to stay afloat. And a technique I found successful was the way in which one processes these emotions. Instead of numbing heartache or substituting these negative emotions with something fleeting, I suggest the process of transformation.

love

I truly understood this when watching Gaspar Noe’s Love, a film depicting a man’s nostalgia toward a lost love. And after finding out his ex-lover went missing possibly from suicide, he falls into a deep, contemplative depression rehearsing his memories of them together. While the audience is left with a vague ending, the closing statement was to heal with the love of another, which in that case, was his son.

And as a woman who has dealt with heartbreak, this deeply resonated with me and something shifted internally. It was then that I understood that melancholia (my current state of mind) was normal, but letting it saturate in my psyche was not, and this was subsequently damaging my healing process. I then knew I had to take conscious steps toward recovery, and I was the only one capable of doing so.

After which, the role of transformation became vital. I shifted my method of replacement by focusing on what I’m grateful for rather than what I lack. I no longer “lacked a partner,” instead I was “grateful for my son.”

love2

And while this is a form of replacement, it’s more importantly a transformation of a literal negative (“lack”) into a positive (“gratitude” i.e. expressing what’s fulfilled). A “lack” will always be present, no matter the success of an individual, as this is a critical pillar of psychoanalysis. In more vulnerable states, such as after a breakup, the individual tends to focus more on the “lack” versus what’s fulfilled. It’s human nature to be negative after adversity.

Now, in the role of transformation, the individual must practice gratitude. In Love, the protagonist, Murphy, began his recovery by admitting his absence to his son, revealing to the audience that he was now in the present and ready to accept change: he acknowledged what gave him fulfillment, which was his unconditional love toward his child, Gaspar. Murphy accepted that he would always “lack” his ex-lover, but simultaneously understood that he could overcome that deficit through love. Being aware of this perpetual “lack” (especially in the case of her death), is the initial stage of healing. The final step is knowing what provides fulfillment.

Fulfillment can take many forms: for many it’s the unconditional love toward their child, for others it’s the forgiveness given to an ex-partner. It’s inarguably subjective, as I’ve known many friends who learn to unapologetically love themselves as well.

And while a rebound could figuratively fulfill the broken, it’s healthiest to recognize fulfillment outside of a romantic relationship, otherwise it will begin a vicious cycle of constant lack and dissatisfaction. For those “serial monogamists,” there’s more than likely a trend in destructive relationships and their demise when looked at in closer observation.

love3

Unlike in the myth told in Plato’s Symposium, a person is not missing their other half. We were never ripped in apart and destined to find fulfillment in another soulmate. While love can provide increased serotonin levels and the release of endorphins, becoming symbolically “whole” on one’s own is imperative when fostering healthy, romantic relationships.

And when referring to “whole,” I’m not suggesting an entire completeness of oneself. As stated before, “lack” will always be present, regardless of the success of the individual. Rather, through recognition of this perpetual “lack,” we will no longer look for it in a significant other. In an ideal relationship, the partners’ “lack” will simply overlap, similar to a venn diagram.

So in the midst of heartbreak and pain, one must take necessary steps to heal in order to expedite the process. Deep reflection is crucial, because accepting one’s “lack” is vital in achieving the ultimate transformer, gratitude. It’s a matter of balancing the scale, and realizing that despite the “lack,” there is fulfillment outside of it. Because much like a wildfire, one’s despondency can eventually be eradicated through great technique and patience.

Revisiting ‘Her Lessons Are Her Only Possessions’: A Clever Reminder of My Endless Growth

Four years ago, I wrote a compilation of essays titled, Her Lessons Are Her Only Possessions, a phrase I copied from Harmony Korine’s experimental novel, A Crack-Up at the Race Riots. I remember how those words struck an emotional chord with me, as I was learning to shed material possessions as a nod to my spiritual growth. Being poor also helped.

This compilation of essays was our final project for my writing certification course. It was essentially a collection of what we’d written over the past year. I failed to finished my novella so I curated my non-fiction work instead. While my previous writing makes me cringe at times, the themes behind the essays are something I’m proud of and have steadily held onto. I approached topics like the dichotomy of nihilism and love (ridding oneself of the ego) and non-monogamy. I was always fascinated by love and the role it played in the human species.

hb_1999.363.21

I was twenty-two when I wrote it. I had loved maybe less than a handful of people at that point in my life. Men had hurt me and I had hurt them. It was an endless cycle of pain that as an artist, blossomed my creativity, often in the form of melancholic literature or ominous films. I loved the lingering feeling of doom because it was familiar. It was cathartic making these emotions tangible.

And although it’s only been four years since I published this collection, I know I’ve grown tremendously since then. Unsurprisingly, living in a foreign country shed my American ego that I subconsciously had. Being in an incompatible relationship taught me about self-worth. Having a child made me re-center my entire mental framework. And dealing with bureaucracy led me down a path of maturity that I never asked for.

And I think this is what life is about: receiving unwanted lessons, but having to learn from them regardless. Many people have been heartbroken after the intention of staying together for good, just as many others have been left with insurmountable debt after an unexpected accident. I was watching a movie that poetically illustrated this, in which the character stated, “without blemishes, life would lose character.”

I agreed with their sentiment. But what I found more compelling was the importance of these “blemishes.”

5497341

I’m a champion for Carl Jung’s quote, “I am not what happened to me, I am what I choose to become.” I’ve met countless people who’ve been through unwarranted hardship and carry it with wisdom, while I’ve met those with minor hardship who ask for pity. One is arguably more favored than the other, but due to complex psychological reasoning, some can’t help but ask for sympathy for otherwise insignificant circumstances.

And in the midst of an emotional limbo, I’m learning to value my previous experiences. I’ve curtailed my spending, focusing instead on relationships with friends, family, and my son. I’ve had countless hours of reflecting, instilling that my only new possessions are my lessons. And what I’ve learned from these lessons is invaluable; they are what make me, me.

My identity rests on the miscalculated decisions I’ve made throughout my life. The times when I followed my gut and ignored it are the times I reflect on most: it’s a representation of my growth as a person, and I have no doubt I’ll continue learning new lessons in the years to come.